Japan Medical
Tokyo, Japan International Patient Support
Contact Us
Medical Content Policy Japan Medical Last Updated: August 1, 2026

Medical Content Policy

Medical information can influence decisions about health, treatment, travel, and significant expense. Japan Medical aims to publish content that is understandable, evidence-aware, appropriately qualified, and clear about uncertainty.

Source qualityWe prioritize authoritative and primary sources where available.
Evidence contextStudy design and limitations matter as much as headline results.
Clear boundariesRegulatory pathways, clinical research, and product approval are not treated as interchangeable.

Sources We Prefer

Primary and authoritative sources come first

01

Japanese public authorities

Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, and other relevant Japanese public bodies.

02

Clinical registries

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials and other appropriate trial or study registries when they are relevant to a claim.

03

Peer-reviewed literature

Original clinical studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and peer-reviewed medical journals.

04

Clinical guidance

Clinical guidelines and consensus statements from appropriate professional or public health bodies.

05

Provider documentation

Official information from a medical institution may be used for institution-specific facts such as services, schedules, or administrative requirements.

06

Commercial materials

Marketing materials are not treated as equivalent to independent clinical evidence.

How We Describe Evidence

Study design changes what a result can support

Preclinical

Laboratory and animal findings should be identified as preclinical and should not be presented as demonstrated clinical benefit in humans.

Observational

Case reports and observational studies may identify patterns or possible signals but can be affected by confounding and selection bias.

Interventional

Clinical trials should be described with relevant context such as sample size, comparison group, endpoints, follow-up, and major limitations.

Systematic

Systematic reviews and guidelines may provide broader evidence context but should still be represented within their stated scope.

Patient relevance

Results from a study population cannot guarantee the same outcome for an individual patient.

Regenerative Medicine

Three concepts must stay separate

Regulatory pathway

A treatment may be handled under a Japanese legal or regulatory framework without that fact itself establishing PMDA marketing approval of a product.

Clinical research

Registration or publication of a study or plan does not by itself prove clinical effectiveness for a particular indication.

Product approval

PMDA separately publishes information concerning regenerative medical products that have received approval in Japan.

Benefits, Risks and Uncertainty

Do not present possibility as certainty

Benefits need context Potential benefits should be presented with the level of evidence and the population or condition in which they were studied.
Risks belong beside benefits Relevant adverse effects, limitations, contraindications, or areas of uncertainty should not be hidden behind promotional language.
Absolute claims are avoided Terms such as guaranteed, risk-free, proven cure, and similar absolute claims should not be used unless they are clearly justified by authoritative evidence and context.
Alternatives matter Where appropriate, content should acknowledge that other established diagnostic or treatment options may exist.
Individual assessment remains necessary Educational content cannot determine whether a treatment is appropriate for a specific person.

How We Handle Cost Information

Prices are usually reference information

Provider estimates

Costs may come from provider information and should be identified as estimates or reference figures unless a final charge has been formally confirmed.

Variables

Final medical cost can vary with the institution, patient condition, testing, treatment protocol, medication, hospitalization, follow-up, and other clinical needs.

Currency and timing

Exchange rates and provider pricing can change, so readers should confirm current written costs before making a financial decision.

Editorial Independence and Disclosure

Commercial relationships should not rewrite the evidence

Commercial or coordination relationships should not determine whether scientific evidence is described as positive, negative, uncertain, or limited.

Where Japan Medical has a material financial or commercial relationship with an institution discussed on the website and that relationship could reasonably affect a reader’s understanding, our policy is to disclose it appropriately.

Review, Updates and Corrections

Medical content needs ongoing review

01

New evidence

Important content may be updated when substantial new clinical evidence becomes available.

02

Regulatory change

Material changes to regulatory status or official safety information should trigger review.

03

Availability change

Provider availability, treatment protocols, pricing, or administrative requirements may need revision when they materially change.

04

Corrections

When a material factual error is identified, we aim to review and correct it as soon as reasonably practicable.

05

Review dates

Important medical pages should display a publication date, review date, or last-updated date so readers can judge recency.

Official Reference Framework

Useful sources for verification

PMDA: Approved Product Information

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials

Readers should still discuss important individual medical decisions with an appropriately qualified healthcare professional.

Contact Japan Medical

Found a possible content error?

Contact Japan Medical with the page title and the statement you believe should be reviewed. We will assess material factual issues against appropriate sources.

Message Us on WhatsApp
WhatsApp: +81-8070161366 LINE: +81-8075357788 Operating Hours: 10:00 AM – 6:00 PM

5-4-6 Ginza, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0061, Japan