Japan Medical
Tokyo, Japan International Patient Support
Contact Us
What we knowReviewed August 2026

Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Diseases

Stem-cell approaches are not one established treatment for this disease group. In acute ischemic stroke, the 206-patient TREASURE trial did not improve the primary 90-day outcome. In Japan, RiHEART has a conditional pathway only for severe heart failure caused by ischemic cardiomyopathy after standard drug and invasive care have been insufficient. [1] [2]

StrokeNo routine cell therapy established
Severe ischemic cardiomyopathyNarrow Japan-specific pathway
Generic IV infusionsEvidence cannot be transferred between products

We help organize medical information, compare product-specific evidence, prepare your questions, coordinate appointments and support medical translation. We don’t diagnose, prescribe or perform treatment.

Medical imaging and regenerative medicine information review

Your exact diagnosis, imaging, timing and previous care determine whether published evidence is relevant.

01match

Does your diagnosis fit the evidence?

Does the current evidence match your diagnosis?

The disease subtype and treatment stage matter more than the label “stem cell.”

01

Acute ischemic stroke

The largest Japan phase 2/3 randomized study of IV MultiStem did not show a significant 90-day functional benefit.

Investigational
02

Chronic post-stroke disability

Smaller studies have tested different cell types, routes and time windows. Results are not consistent enough to support one routine approach.

Investigational
03

Hemorrhagic stroke

Evidence from ischemic stroke cannot be assumed to apply after brain hemorrhage. Product- and disease-specific data are required.

Investigational
04

Severe ischemic cardiomyopathy

RiHEART has conditional and time-limited approval in Japan for a narrow group after an inadequate response to standard care.

Specific Japan Pathway
05

Other heart or vascular conditions

RiHEART data do not prove benefit for non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, stable coronary disease, peripheral vascular disease or generic IV cell infusions.

Product Specific
Not sure which evidence applies?

Start with the diagnosis, event date and latest imaging summary.

02fit

Compare with your records

Compare your records with the published patient groups.

These are study and product criteria, not a personal eligibility checklist. They show whether the outcome numbers below are reasonably comparable to your case.

TREASURE stroke trial

Who was actually studied?

Stroke typeAcute ischemic stroke, not hemorrhagic stroke
Stroke severityNIHSS 8–20 at baseline
MRI findingCortical infarct larger than 2 cm on diffusion-weighted MRI
Before the strokeModified Rankin Scale 0–1, meaning little or no previous disability
TimingOne IV dose 18–36 hours after stroke onset
Why this matters: these results do not directly answer whether a different cell product helps chronic post-stroke disability, hemorrhagic stroke or treatment at a different time point. [1]
RiHEART Japan pathway

What makes the approved use narrow?

CauseSevere heart failure associated with ischemic cardiomyopathy
Heart pumpingLVEF at rest of 35% or lower is specified in PMDA precautions
Previous careInadequate response to standard drug therapy and invasive interventions
Study experienceAll eight study patients had prior PCI or CABG and were NYHA Class III
Important limitPatients with heart failure serious enough for LVAD consideration are not indicated under PMDA precautions
Do not self-screen from these numbers. PMDA requires selection by physicians who understand the study population, efficacy limits and safety risks. [2]
03stroke

What the TREASURE trial found

The 206-patient phase 2/3 trial did not meet its efficacy goal.

TREASURE tested one IV dose of 1.2 billion allogeneic multipotent adult progenitor cells 18 to 36 hours after acute ischemic stroke at 44 sites in Japan. [1]

206randomized participants
18–36 htreatment window after stroke onset
11.5%excellent outcome at day 90 with MultiStem
9.8%excellent outcome with placebo; P=.90
Efficacy: Excellent outcome at day 365 was 15.4% with MultiStem and 10.8% with placebo; the difference was not statistically significant (P=.43). Safety: overall adverse-event frequency was similar between groups and no grade 3 or 4 infusion-related allergic reactions were reported. Investigator-assessed treatment-emergent events related to the study drug occurred in 29.8% of MultiStem patients and 11.8% of placebo patients. [1]
Medical record and imaging review for ischemic stroke evidence
04products

Three products, three outcomes

Three products. Three very different conclusions.

A cell source, delivery route and regulatory result cannot be transferred to another product.

01

MultiStem

Bone-marrow-derived allogeneic multipotent adult progenitor cells given intravenously. The primary 90-day efficacy endpoint was not improved in TREASURE.

IV route206 patientsNo proven 90-day benefit
02

HeartSheet

An autologous skeletal-myoblast cell-sheet product. PMDA found that superiority was not shown for cardiac-disease-related death: HR 1.9 (95% CI 0.8–4.4; P=.136). The HR for hospitalization due to a major cardiovascular event was 1.5 (95% CI 0.6–3.6), and core-lab LVEF improvement of at least 5% at six months was 7.9% with HeartSheet versus 16.5% in control. Full approval was not supported. [4]

Cell sheetNot randomizedEfficacy not demonstrated
03

RiHEART

An allogeneic iPS-cell-derived cardiomyocyte sheet placed directly on the heart surface. Japan granted a conditional, time-limited pathway with required post-market evidence collection. [2]

iPS-derived cardiomyocytesThoracotomyConditional pathway

Approval is country-specific. [6]

Review of severe ischemic cardiomyopathy records and regenerative medicine evidence
05RiHEART

How RiHEART works

It is not a generic IV stem-cell infusion.

The approved pathway is narrow and the procedure is substantial. [2]

61.1mean age in years
30.5%mean baseline LVEF
8/8had previous PCI or CABG
8/8were NYHA Class III
Who

Severe heart failure caused by ischemic cardiomyopathy after an inadequate response to standard drug and invasive treatment.

Product

Three cardiomyocyte sheets, each containing about 33 million allogeneic iPS-derived cardiomyocytes, approximately 100 million cells in total.

Procedure

The three sheets are transplanted onto the heart surface. A left thoracotomy is used in principle.

Aftercare

Prednisolone, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil are used for 90 days, including tapering.

Official Japan reimbursement reference¥53.2 million

MHLW set this product-level reimbursement price for planned listing on September 1, 2026. The document limits reimbursement to defined use criteria and one calculation per person. This is not a generic self-pay quote or a guaranteed personal out-of-pocket amount. [3]

06outcomes

What the eight-patient data shows

Functional signals were observed, but the evidence base is eight patients.

The exploratory study was open-label and uncontrolled. PMDA cautioned that the small sample, concomitant care, rehabilitation and patient motivation limit efficacy conclusions. The response counts below are taken from PMDA and MHLW summaries. [2] [3]

8patients in the main exploratory efficacy and safety dataset
2/8

had at least a 5% improvement in echocardiographic LVEF at week 26

8/8

had at least a one-level NYHA functional-class improvement at week 52

4/7

had at least a 10% increase in peak VO2 at week 52; one result was missing

4/8

had at least a 45-meter increase in six-minute walk distance at week 52

Safety needs the same attention as efficacy. In the eight-patient study, adverse events occurred in 7/8 (87.5%), serious adverse events in 5/8 (62.5%), events potentially related to the transplantation procedure in 5/8 (62.5%), and events potentially related to immunosuppressants in 7/8 (87.5%). PMDA reported no adverse reaction attributed to RiHEART itself and no adverse event leading to death in this study. These small numbers cannot establish a stable safety rate. [2]
LVEFheart pumping percentage
NYHAsymptom and activity limitation class
Peak VO2exercise capacity
6MWDdistance walked in six minutes
07recovery

Recovery: what you can track

Do not accept a generic “stem-cell survival rate.”

There is no reliable personal “stem-cell survival rate” for this disease group. The available RiHEART follow-up is useful to know, but far too small to prove a survival benefit. [3]

5 patientscompany-submitted MHLW summary: followed to 3 years with no deaths reported
3 patientscompany-submitted MHLW summary: followed to 5 years with no deaths reported
75 patientstarget for required all-case post-market efficacy and safety surveillance
How to read these numbers

No deaths in a five-patient or three-patient follow-up subset does not mean a 100% expected survival rate. There was no randomized comparator for RiHEART, and MHLW identifies survival and heart-failure hospitalization as outcomes that still need post-market evaluation. For stroke, TREASURE did not show an overall functional benefit at 90 or 365 days.

Follow-up assessment and recovery measurement for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular conditions
After strokeDisability level (mRS), neurological deficit score (NIHSS), daily independence (Barthel Index), plus gait, hand function, speech or cognition based on the actual deficit.
For heart failureSymptom limitation (NYHA), six-minute walking distance, exercise capacity (peak VO2), heart pumping percentage (LVEF), admissions, major events and survival.
Before any interventionRecord baseline values and the planned follow-up interval. Without a baseline, a later claim of “improvement” is difficult to interpret.
08urgent

Don’t skip standard care

Do not delay established care while considering cell-based options.

For eligible acute ischemic stroke patients, the 2026 AHA/ASA guideline supports IV thrombolysis with alteplase or tenecteplase within the 4.5-hour treatment window and broader use of endovascular thrombectomy in selected patients. A regenerative-medicine discussion should never delay emergency assessment or reperfusion care. [5]

Possible stroke

New facial droop, one-sided weakness or numbness, speech difficulty, sudden vision loss or other sudden neurological symptoms require emergency assessment.

Possible cardiac emergency

New or severe chest pressure, fainting, marked breathlessness or rapidly worsening symptoms require emergency assessment.

Reviewing the full cost components of a product-specific regenerative medicine option
09costs

What it really costs

There is no responsible single price for “stem-cell treatment.”

A price only becomes meaningful when it is tied to the exact product, route, procedure, number of administrations and follow-up plan.

Exact productProduct name, cell source, autologous or allogeneic status and current regulatory pathway.
Route and procedureIV infusion, local delivery and surgery have very different resource and risk profiles.
Pre-treatment workupImaging, laboratory testing, specialist review and any required functional assessment.
Medicines and monitoringSome products require immunosuppression, laboratory monitoring and more intensive follow-up.
Recovery and follow-upConfirm which imaging, functional tests, rehabilitation reviews and safety checks are included.
Travel and language supportRecord translation, interpretation, transport and accommodation can materially change total cost.

Have a quote or proposal already?

Compare it against the exact product, evidence and follow-up it actually includes.

10support

How we can help

Turn scattered records into a clearer next discussion.

We focus on information and coordination: what your diagnosis is, which evidence matches it, what questions to ask, what the quoted cost includes and what records should be ready.

Useful records: exact diagnosis and event date; discharge summary; latest brain MRI or CT report; NIHSS or mRS if available; echocardiography or cardiac imaging with LVEF; NYHA class if documented; current medicines; PCI, CABG or other major procedures; and recent rehabilitation or exercise assessments.

Organize the records

Put the diagnosis, timing, imaging, medicines, procedures and functional status into one usable summary.

Match the evidence

Separate product-specific trial data from claims that come from a different cell type, route or condition.

Prepare the questions

Clarify expected endpoints, risks, required medicines, alternatives, total cost and follow-up before you decide.

Coordinate the next discussion

Support appointment coordination and medical translation so the right questions can be discussed clearly.

Now what?

Find out which evidence actually applies to you.

Send us the diagnosis, when the event or worsening occurred, your latest imaging or echocardiography summary, your current medications, past procedures and any cell-based option you’re already looking at. We’ll help you organize the information and questions before your next discussion.

DiagnosisEvent timingLatest imagingCurrent medicinesPrevious proceduresProposed cell product
WhatsApp: +81-8070161366LINE: +81-8075357788

Educational information only. Individual eligibility, risks, alternatives, prognosis and treatment decisions require assessment by a licensed physician. Evidence and regulatory status can change; confirm the exact product and current status before making a medical or financial decision.